data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bdd99/bdd99e566ba388849adf81e9a0baadf3683733ad" alt=""
The introduction that Mitchell provides is a lengthy description of the entire story, and it provided an excellent background for the reading. Yes, it told the entire plot, but I don't feel that Gilgamesh is something that can be spoiled by knowing the plot ahead of time. And once I got into the reading, I was swept up into the story. It really provides a fascinating look at life in ancient Sumeria. Of course, it cannot necessarily be taken as an accurate picture, because it is a story, after all, but simply the descriptions of the gods, and the temples, and the city of "great-walled Uruk" are revealing. Not having read any other translations of this work, I can't really compare it, but I really enjoyed this one, and would recommend it for anyone looking at reading this ancient tale.
This is also the third of the many, many books I plan on reading for the Really Old Classics Challenge. Soon really old classics are all I'll be reading!
2 comments:
I think that's the thing about the intros to many of the old classics: they are full of the "spoilers" and yet reading the classics are about the experience and not necessarily the plot.
I still tend to skim the intros at the beginning and then go back and read them after I read the work. Of course, then I want to reread the work .... .lol!
I just recently listened to the audio book of this version and they actually put the intro at the end, which I kind of liked. I'll hopefully be posting a review soon.
Post a Comment